imo i get why its called boymoding but i legit think the fact that it's called that has like done worse for girls

"Oh ur BOYmoding, ur dressed as a BOY bc ur wearing BOY clothes"

like it creates a bad feel loop. a tgirl telling me to reframe it as dressing masc/butchy has done wonders for me itr

like the need to "boymode" to be safe i totally understand

but like internally I think if more girls reframed it as "im dressing masc/butch/futch/tomboy/etc"

they'd feel less bad when they do dress like that/lets tgirl butchs be more normalized in the community

the fact that the cyberpunk 2077 character creator doesn't let you be fat is utterly indefensible. like even elden ring let's you have more different kinds of body types than cyberpunk and elden ring doesn't advertise itself on "In The Lands Between you can BE ANYONE...."

"In Night City, you can become anyone" except fat. Ok. Sure. Fucking embarrassingly Reddit game. They have a gun that talks to you named Skippy and you have a penis circumcised or uncircumcised toggle but letting you be fat isn't believable enough or is considered irrelevantly granular control of your character. okay sure. jesus christ.

like i enjoy a lot of things about this game I think in a lot of ways its AAA slop but like so are a lot of like fine or decent games and the gameplay loop is pretty enjoyable but this is like genuinely silly. like? if you walk around night city it literally looks like every single person shops at brandy melville.

it is truly laughable that every game that gets press for its Epic Character Creator is lapped in this respect by saints row 2, a game from 2008

A palestinian American boy was shot by the IOF and no one even cares in the US. not like I didn't know that Palestinians will always be treated as if they're invisible in US politics but it really puts in perspective how Palestinian Americans are treated vs how israeli Americans. No one will shut up about the American guy who hamas has but us Palestinians dying as children is just whatever.

this isn't even the "piss-poor reading comprehension" website half the time, it's the "I know that posting something strident feels good but can you maybe take ten seconds to consider whether you're interpreting the post as uncharitably as you possibly could" website

it feels like a goddamn contest sometimes

I'm not gonna act like I'm immune to doing this, either, but I do remember a time a couple years ago when I did this and then had the sense to immediately go "wait. I should reread that and make sure I'm not making up a girl to get mad at"

and I absolutely had been. so I walked it back. and I like to think that was a Learning Experience for me.

trans people will literally go “i have a complicated relationship with my history with gender and sometimes see it as a gender i ‘used to be’ and i don’t really look like a cis person of either gender and i don’t think i can fit it into simple categories” and everyone will spontaneously combust

i remember being at some lgbtqia+ group when i was at an all girl’s school and i was one of two trans people, i was the only butch or even vaguely masculine person in the room, and i said something along the lines of “i consider myself a guy who used to be a girl” and five minutes later one of my friends(if you would say that ig) went “yeah so he was always a boy, he just didn’t know it yet” about me. and i had to stand there like What Did I Just Say. Can Anyone Hear Me

now i make posts like “sometimes trans men used to be girls and sometimes trans women used to be boys and it’s ok if we think about it like that” and everyone immediately acts like they want me dead

quick reminder that everything russia’s doing to ukraine isn’t new. there were 170 governmental bans on ukrainian language in the last 150 years. most of ukrainian writers from the basic school literature curriculum were murdered or oppressed for speaking out for ukraine. an average person doesn’t have to know executed renaissance or slovo house or the ems ukaz or forced russification or literally hundreds of similar precedents, but please do note that this all was a thing long before putin

image

Russia has this weird confederate-esque sense of entitlement to determining the fates of Eastern European peoples, like it believes living under the Russian boot is their natural and normal condition. Poles, Balts, Ukrainians, Romanians, etc.

This is why seemingly every incarnation of the Russian state has found its own justification for its oppression of the same peoples, regardless of its self declared ideology. The Russian Empire oppressed them to bring them Russian civilization. The Soviet Union oppressed them to free the working class and fight the capitalists. The Russian Federation oppresses them because they’re actually just confused Russians.

It’s a deep, ingrained racism going back hundreds of years. And it’s disgusting to see how so many on this site defend it.

my issue with the argument that "disliking ai art is inherently reactionary" is that it acts like pro-ai art people are somehow less reactionary on their views on art, when like the majority of defense's of ai art as like a higher form art are indistinguishable from the arguments people use to defend the art of like. hitler

image
image

like the logic is that hitler was actually a great artist, entirely hinges on the belief that "objectively good art" is just art that looks detailed if you've never drawn before, which like why ai artists who want to prove their actual artists will just make a pretty looking building or lady, cause it's all about aesthetics i guess

like i'm not saying your a nazi if you like ai art, i just think it's silly when people act like anti-ai artist's are just hysterical luddites, and that ai artists are the ONLY people who actually care about art, when 99 percent of ai artists on twitter only care about art that's "beautiful" on an extremely superficial level.

Jacob Geller dissected the intersection of Fascism and modern art in 2020, sadly before the AI art boom, and goes into better detail than I can about how abstraction is a threat to fascist ideals. I also want to draw attention to possibly my favorite commentary on modernism.

image
image

Comic by Ad Reinhardt, an abstract painter, who's made multiple comics about art and perception.

AI slop only bring repetition and lack of original idea to the table. it's an advanced form of stolen art collage. It seeks only to trace and multiply without provoking. It's the anthesis of art.

The way I explained it to my young cousin was like this:

Back before cameras, paintings were just recording reality, and that's why painters tried to be as realistic as they could, and only paint things that could exist in the world around them--objects, and people, and animals. Sometimes they did paint things from their imagination, but only to illustrate stories, like stories from their religion.

Then, cameras came along, and painters were free to paint things cameras couldn't see--things like the artist's feelings, or ideas, or thoughts, or lots of things. Some artists tried to see if they could paint from every angle at once, and we call that Cubism. Some artists tried to paint very quickly, as quickly as they could, so they could capture one single moment of the daylight, or their impression of a moment, with all the feelings light gives, and that's why we call them Impressionists. Some artists were more interested in the process of painting, like Mr Rothko; or in finding the most intense versions of a colour, like Mr Klein. Some were more interested in the spaces between things, like Mr Mondrian. But art, after cameras, could suddenly SAY something, say something by itself! And art, as it turns out, has a lot to say!

"I can do that too! I can do that!" You can, little friend! We all can!

My little cousin didn't get mad looking at modern art; she was excited, and asked her parents if she could have fancy grown-up paints, because she didn't know Art could be something she could do, could be something about expressing her feelings and ideas. This is a child who can't yet write very well, and not nearly as fast or as well as she speaks, so you have to understand something clicked for her, that she could express the complex human things inside herself with colour and shapes and images, instead of struggling to learn how to spell "melancholy" or "excited" or conjugate verbs to a degree that could encompass it.

Because words take TIME to master as an art form--I should know, I've been practising using them to express MY ideas and feelings artistically for 36-and-a-half years! Paint, however, doesn't require such mastery in order to begin expressing the artist; certainly it helps to know skills, but it isn't as required as it is with words. You can just scream and yell with paint, you can experiment more purely with images than with sounds, which after all are regimented into languages before we can begin to use them at all, let alone for the art words make.

And honestly, why are whole-ass adults not understanding that "I could make that!" should be exciting, should inspire you to go and make that! Why are you so mad? "I could make that!" Yes you can! And you get to! And you're an adult, you don't have to ask your parents to buy you paint and canvas and brushes, you can go and do that yourself and be expressing your own feelings this very afternoon! Nothing is stopping you! You don't NEED that plagiarism machine, you can do better art yourself! And nobody else in the whole world, now or in the past or in the future, is EVER going to be able to make the art YOU can make, the art YOU have inside you! So go make it!